Our Work In Practice
These examples show how Spark delivers in real settings. They demonstrate approach and maturity — not inflated scale claims.
Case Study 1: System-Level Delivery: Belfast Met and W5 LIFE
(Education. Pathways. Multidisciplinary working)
Context
Spark supported the delivery of W5 LIFE, a multi-partner digital skills programme designed to support neurodivergent adults into education and employment pathways, delivered in partnership with Belfast Metropolitan College and W5 LIFE.
Spark’s role
Spark provided trauma-aware learner recruitment and onboarding, on-site multidisciplinary input during delivery, advisory support to tutors on inclusive practice, and captured learning across cohorts to inform future delivery.
Approach
Delivery prioritised psychological safety, flexible participation, consistent staffing, and close partnership working. Support was preventative, relational, and needs-led rather than standardised or compliance-driven.
Outcome
Learners engaged with education pathways in ways that felt accessible and affirming, while partners gained insight into inclusive delivery across education-to-employment transitions.
What this demonstrates
- System-level partnership delivery across education and culture
- Joined-up practitioner working alongside live delivery
- Trauma-aware recruitment and retention practices
- Psychological safety as a foundation for learning
Read the full case study:
A detailed overview of system-level delivery, MDT working, and learner support across education–employment pathways.
Case Study 2: Research in Practice: ICEP Europe and Neurodiversity Spark
(Education · Research · Governance)
Context
Neurodiversity Spark undertook applied research connected to adult education contexts, focused on strengthening understanding of neurodivergent learner experiences and supporting evidence-informed practice.
Spark’s role
Led by Spark’s Director of Research, Professor April Hargreaves, Spark designed and delivered governance-aware research activity under a clear ethical, consent-led, and boundary-aware research framework.
Approach
Research was trauma-aware and practice-led, with a clear separation maintained between research activity, service delivery, and organisational learning. The focus was on strengthening practice rather than generating performance or marketing claims.
Outcome
The work supported institutional learning and more informed, ethical approaches to neuroinclusive adult education practice. Findings are expected to be shared in mid-2026.
What this demonstrates
- Ethically governed, funder-safe research practice
- Clear separation between research and delivery
- Trauma-informed inquiry in adult education contexts
- Evidence-led improvement without performative impact
Read the research case study:
Case Study 3: Partnership Delivery: Lightyear Foundation & Longstone Special School
(Education · SEN settings · Partnership delivery)
Context
Spark delivered a short series of hands-on, neuroinclusive STEM workshops at Longstone Special School, in partnership with Lightyear Foundation, within a specialist education setting in Northern Ireland.
The work formed part of Lightyear Foundation’s inclusive STEM activity and was delivered within a real school environment, shaped by pupils’ needs and existing staff expertise.
Spark’s role
Spark led the facilitation of three STEM sessions exploring the heart, circulation, and blood, using physical models, movement-based exploration, and sensory-aware approaches.
Delivery was facilitative rather than instructional, with content adapted in real time to support engagement, regulation, and understanding.
Approach
Work was accessibility-by-design rather than adjustment-led. Sessions prioritised strengths-based participation, visual and physical learning, and flexible engagement, shaped through ongoing dialogue with school staff and responsive facilitation in the room.
Outcome
Pupils engaged with complex scientific ideas through hands-on, exploratory activities in ways that felt safe, accessible, and enjoyable within a specialist school context.
What this demonstrates
- Neuroinclusive STEM delivery in specialist education settings
- Sensory-aware, movement-based learning design
- Relationship-led partnership with schools and third-sector organisations
- Context-responsive facilitation without packaged curricula
Read the full case study:
A detailed look at relationship-led, neuroinclusive STEM delivery in a special-school context.
Case Study 4: Multidisciplinary Neuroinclusion Training: Workplace Practice at W5 Belfast
(Corporate. Leadership. Workforce Inclusion)
Context
Spark delivered a full-day neuroinclusion-focused training for HR professionals, managers, and organisational leaders, hosted at W5 Belfast. The session supported organisations seeking to move beyond awareness into practical, evidence-informed action.
Spark’s role
Spark designed and facilitated the full-day training, bringing together multidisciplinary expertise across research, lived experience, and applied practice. Delivery included Spark’s Director of Research alongside trusted professional partners, modelling joined-up neuroinclusion in action.
Approach
Training was facilitation-led rather than content-led. Delivery prioritised psychological safety, reflective discussion, and real workplace scenarios. Input from different disciplines allowed participants to explore neuroinclusion across policy, leadership, culture, and day-to-day practice — without prescriptive solutions or fixed outcomes.
Outcome
Participants engaged deeply with the material and left with clearer, actionable steps to reduce barriers and support neurodivergent colleagues across the employee lifecycle.
What this demonstrates
- Multidisciplinary delivery in corporate and leadership settings
- Research-informed training grounded in lived and professional experience
- Translation of evidence into practical organisational action
- Inclusion designed into learning environments, not added on
Read the case study:
🎥 → Reflections video
A light-touch, behind-the-scenes look at the day.
Unsure what kind of support is appropriate?
We recommend starting with a short, structured conversation to understand context, risk, and what’s actually needed.
No obligation. No packaged solutions. Just clarity.