Partnership Delivery in SEN Settings: Neuroinclusive STEM Workshops with Lightyear Foundation

Specialist education · Accessibility-by-design · Relationship-led delivery

Context

Neurodiversity Spark partnered with Lightyear Foundation to deliver a short series of hands-on, neuroinclusive STEM workshops at Longstone Special School, a specialist educational setting in Northern Ireland.

The workshops formed part of Lightyear Foundation’s wider commitment to inclusive science education, particularly for children and young people who are often excluded from traditional STEM learning environments.

Rather than delivering a pre-packaged programme, the focus was on creating accessible, engaging science experiences that worked with pupils’ sensory, communication, and movement needs, not against them.

Delivery took place within a real school environment, in close collaboration with staff who know their pupils deeply and understand the conditions required for learning to feel safe, meaningful, and achievable.

Spark’s role

Spark facilitated a three-session STEM workshop series, adapting content in real time to support participation, curiosity, and regulation.

Spark’s role included:

  • live facilitation of practical science activities
  • adapting pace, structure, and sensory load during sessions
  • working alongside school staff to align delivery with pupils’ needs
  • creating space for movement, exploration, and different ways of engaging
  • ensuring activities remained rigorous without being simplified or diluted

 

Rather than delivering “activities”, Spark facilitated learning experiences, responding dynamically to what was happening in the room.

Learner and staff experience

Across the three sessions, pupils engaged in ways that worked for them — moving, testing, collaborating, asking questions, and making sense of complex ideas without being funnelled into a single “correct” way of learning.

Staff insight and support were central to this success, helping create an environment that felt calm, safe, and genuinely inclusive.

As reflected in post-session feedback, engagement was driven not by novelty or performance, but by trust, accessibility, and respect for difference.

Approach

Workshops were designed around physical interaction, visual cues, and discovery-based learning, allowing pupils to engage through movement, touch, observation, and experimentation.

Activities included:

  • building working heart and circulation models
  • turning circulation into a whole-body, movement-based experience
  • making abstract biological concepts visible through hands-on modelling

 

Facilitation was responsive. For example, physiological concepts such as heart rate, breathing, and stress regulation were introduced naturally through pupils’ physical engagement — supporting understanding without forcing compliance or stillness.

Crucially, learning was co-created in the moment, shaped by pupils’ questions, energy, and interests, rather than delivered as a fixed script.

Outcome

The workshops supported meaningful engagement with STEM concepts in a way that felt accessible, affirming, and enjoyable for pupils.

For Spark, this work reinforced the value of:

  • designing STEM experiences that are adaptable rather than standardised
  • treating inclusion as a design principle, not an adjustment
  • working in partnership with schools rather than delivering to them

 

This was relationship-led delivery and not a packaged intervention.

What this demonstrates

  • System-level delivery across education and employment pathways
  • Trauma-aware recruitment and onboarding
  • MDT working embedded into live delivery
  • Psychological safety as a foundation for participation
  • Learning capture to inform future cohorts

Learn how Neurodiversity Spark designs learning environments that work for neurodivergent learners.

If you’re unsure where to begin, we recommend Access the Expert as the simplest first step.